Holmes v. Bd. of Commissioners, 517 S.E.2d 788 (Ga. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Holmes v. Bd. of Commissioners, 517 S.E.2d 788 (Ga. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Michael C. Hall v. Margaret Hill (gactapp, 2021-06-30)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Michael C. Hall v. Margaret Hill (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holmes v. Bd. of Commrs., 271 Ga. 206, 206 ( 517 SE2d 788 ) (1999) (injunction prohibited where appeal serves as adequate remedy).
discussed Cited "see" Holmes v. ACHOR CENTER, INC. (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holmes v. Bd. of Commrs., 271 Ga. 206 ( 517 SE2d 788 ) (1999); Anderson v. Dowd, 268 Ga. 146 ( 485 SE2d 764 ) (1997); United Baptist Church v. Holmes, 232 Ga. App. 253 ( 500 SE2d 653 ) (1998); Achor Center v. Holmes, 219 Ga. App. 399 ( 465 SE2d 451 ) (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Holmes v. Achor Center, Inc. (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Holmes v. Bd. of Commrs., 271 Ga. 206 ( 517 SE2d 788 ) (1999); Anderson v. Dowd, 268 Ga. 146 ( 485 SE2d 764 ) (1997); Holmes v. Peebles, 251 Ga. App. 417 ( 554 SE2d 566 ) (2001); Holmes v. Sta-Brite Awning Systems, 251 Ga. App. 367 ( 554 SE2d 327 ) (2001); Holmes v. Achor Center, 249 Ga. App. 184 ( 547 SE2d 332 ) (2001) (Achor III); Capitol View Community Church v. Achor Center, 242 Ga. App. XXV (2000) (not officially reported); Holmes v. Achor Center, 242 Ga. App. 887 ( 531 SE2d 773 ) (2000) (Achor ID; United Baptist Church v. Holmes, 232 Ga. App. 253 ( 500 SE2d 653 ) (1998); Achor C…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Holmes v. Sta-Brite Awning Systems, Inc. (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Johnson, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur. 1 See Holmes v. Achor Center, 249 Ga. App. 184, 185 ( 547 SE2d 332 ) (2001); see also Holmes v. Bd. of Commrs., 271 Ga. 206 ( 517 SE2d 788 ) (1999); Anderson v. Dowd, 268 Ga. 146 ( 485 SE2d 764 ) (1997); Holmes v. Achor Center, 242 Ga. App. 887 ( 531 SE2d 773 ) (2000); United Baptist Church v. Holmes, 232 Ga. App. 253 ( 500 SE2d 653 ) (1998); Achor Center v. Holmes, 219 Ga. App. 399 ( 465 SE2d 451 ) (1995). 2 Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holmes
v.
Board of Commissioners
S99A0872.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jun 7, 1999.
517 S.E.2d 788
Kenneth R. Holmes, pro se., Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, Milton B. Satcher III, Anna C. Palazzolo, Anandhi S. Rajan, Charles G. Hicks, Elizabeth F. Allen, for appellee., Drew, Eckl & Farnham, Anne M. Landrum, amicus curiae.
Fletcher.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
[*206] Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

This is the fourth appellate opinion arising out of a dispute concerning whether the Reverend Kenneth R. Holmes has the right to hold church services on the property of Achor Center, Inc. [1] Achor swore out a warrant for the arrest of Holmes for criminal trespass in October 1997, and Holmes sought to enjoin the county’s solicitor general from prosecuting him. The trial court denied the injunction, and Holmes appeals. We affirm.

OCGA § 9-5-2 states that equity does not interfere with the administration of the criminal law. “It will neither aid criminal courts in the exercise of their jurisdiction, nor will it restrain or obstruct them.” [2] Although there is an exception when a pending prosecution prevents a person from pursuing his or her occupation, [3] the exception does not apply here because Rev. Holmes is not prohibited from serving as pastor of the Capitol View Community Church or working as a minister in other churches.

In addition, Holmes is not entitled to equitable relief because he has not exhausted his legal remedies. [4] If he is tried and convicted of the criminal trespass of Achor’s property, he may appeal his conviction. Because he has an adequate remedy at law, we affirm the trial court’s denial of his petition for an injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. [*207] Drew, Eckl & Farnham, Anne M. Landrum, amicus curiae.
1

See Anderson v. Dowd, 268 Ga. 146 (485 SE2d 764) (1997) (affirming trial court’s finding that Holmes was in contempt of interlocutory injunction prohibiting him from going onto Achor’s property at any time); United Baptist Church v. Holmes, 232 Ga. App. 253 (500 SE2d 653) (1998) (holding that United Baptist Church and its minister were entitled to summary judgment on Holmes’ claim for malicious prosecution arising out of his June 1993 arrest for criminal trespass of Achor’s property); Achor Center, Inc. v. Holmes, 219 Ga. App. 399 (465 SE2d 451) (1995) (holding Achor Center was entitled to summary judgment on Holmes’ claims for malicious prosecution and tortious interference with business relations arising out of June 1993 arrest).

3

See Baldwin v. City of Atlanta, 147 Ga. 28 (92 SE 630) (1917).

4

Cf. Baez v. Lemacks, 264 Ga. 808 (452 SE2d 491) (1994) (holding that prisoner awaiting trial was not entitled to habeas corpus relief when imprisoned under lawful process and with adequate remedy in pending trial).