Gold v. Town of East Haddam, 938 A.2d 592 (Conn. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
Gold v. Town of East Haddam, 938 A.2d 592 (Conn. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Andrades v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2008-06-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Andrades v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sadler v. Commissioner of Correction, 100 Conn. App. 659, 661 , 918 A.2d 1033 , cert. denied, 285 Conn. 901 , 938 A.2d 593 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leo Gold Et Al.
v.
Town of East Haddam
SC 18067.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 14, 2007.
938 A.2d 592
John S. Bennet, in support of the petition., Leo Gold, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 369 (AC 27952), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[*902] Decided December 14, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18067. John S. Bennet, in support of the petition. Leo Gold, in opposition.

“1. Did the Appellate Court err in its finding that the intent of the voters is a question of fact rather than a question of law to be determined by the language approved by the voters in a town meeting?

“2. Did the Appellate Court err in failing to find that uses which are incidental and secondary to the primary public school purpose do not require the taking to occur within six months of the referendum vote?”