green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.
See Tremain, 196 F.3d at 976-77 (holding that a court may consider extra-record evidence to determine whether the administrator was plagued by a conflict of interest); see also Kosiba v. Merck & Co., 384 F.3d 58 , 67 n. 5 (3d Cir.2004) (holding that a district court may supplement the record in order to decide whether a conflict of interest exists), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1044 , 125 S.Ct. 2252 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1079 (2005). 57 Today, we continue to recognize that, in general, a district court may review only the administrative record when considering whether the plan administrator abused its discr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Insurance
See Tremain, 196 F.3d at 976-77 (holding that a court may consider extra-record evidence to determine whether the administrator was plagued by a conflict of interest); see also Kosiba v. Merck & Co., 384 F.3d 58 , 67 n. 5 (3d Cir.2004) (holding that a district court may supplement the record in order to decide whether a conflict of interest exists), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1044 , 125 S.Ct. 2252 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1079 (2005). [9] Today, we continue to recognize that, in general, a district court may review only the administrative record when considering whether the plan administrator abused its disc…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bp West Coast Products LLC
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
04-900.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 2005.
Published
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC ET AL.
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL.
No. 04-900.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 16, 2005.
1
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. Reported below: 374 F. 3d 1263.