Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc. v. Book, 964 A.2d 546 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc. v. Book, 964 A.2d 546 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clark v. Clark (connappct, 2011-08-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Clark v. Clark (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Book,, 110 Conn. App. 833 , 835 n.4, 956 A.2d 609 (2008), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 909 , 964 A.2d 546 (2009). 2 The defendant additionally claims that the court erred in failing to issue postjudgment orders allocating the responsibilities for joint liabilities.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sanle Zhang v. 56 Locust Rd., LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
"It is axiomatic that a claim is not ripe for adjudication when an injury is hypothetical, or a claim [is] contingent upon some event that has not and indeed may never transpire." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Lost Trail, LLC v. Weston , 140 Conn.App. 136 , 155, 57 A.3d 905 , cert. denied, 308 Conn. 915 , 61 A.3d 1102 (2013) ; see also Astoria Federal Mortgage Corp. v. Matschke , 111 Conn.App. 462 , 464, 959 A.2d 652 (2008) ("the rationale behind the ripeness requirement is to prevent the courts, through avoidance of premature adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagree…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bove v. Bove (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Practice Book §§ 85-2 and 85-3; see also Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., v. Book, 110 Conn. App. 833, 835 , 956 A.2d 609 (2008), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 909 , 964 A.2d 546 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
v.
Ethan Book, Jr., Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 29, 2009.
964 A.2d 546
Ethan Book, Jr., pro se, in support of the petition., Thomas R. Ventre, assistant attorney general, and David F. Borrino, in opposition.
Rogers.
Published

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 110 Conn. App. 833 (AC 27491), is denied.

[*910] Decided January 29, 2009 Ethan Book, Jr., pro se, in support of the petition. Thomas R. Ventre, assistant attorney general, and David F. Borrino, in opposition. ROGERS, C. J., and VERTEFEUILLE, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.