Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905 (Tex. App. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905 (Tex. App. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (38 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Ammie Lucille Smith v. State (texapp, 2014-08-07)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ammie Lucille Smith v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
Without any reference in the record to her retention of counsel or any appointment of counsel, we are constrained to assume that Appellant chose to appear and proceed pro se in this appeal. 3 Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 709 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.); see also TEX.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Carlos Vigil v. State
Tex. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
See Alakhras v. State , 73 S.W.3d 434, 436 (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App. - Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Allen v. State , 730 S.W.2d 374, 375-76 (Tex. App. - Dallas 1987, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App. - Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Carlos Vigil v. State
Tex. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
See Alakhras v. State, 73 S.W.3d 434, 436 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App. – Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Allen v. State, 730 S.W.2d 374, 375-76 (Tex. App. – Dallas 1987, no pet.); Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lauren Olivia Compian v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App. C Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App. C Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App. C Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) John Lee Lawson v. State
Tex. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ann Marie Trevino v. State
Tex. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Federico Roland Garza Jr. v. State
Tex. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Edgar Vernell Quiller v. State
Tex. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jay Gid Bryan v. State
Tex. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
Carroll, 75 S.W.3d at 634 , citing Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994). 3 Our review of the record discloses no “unassigned fundamental error.” See Carroll, 75 S.W.3d at 634 ; Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex.App.–Fort Worth 1991, no pet); Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex.App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jay Gid Bryan v. State
Tex. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
Our review of the record discloses no “unassigned fundamental error.” See Carroll, 75 S.W.3d at 634 ; Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex.App.–Fort Worth 1991, no pet); Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex.App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jay Gid Bryan v. State
Tex. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
Our review of the record discloses no “unassigned fundamental error.” See Carroll, 75 S.W.3d at 634 ; Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex.App.–Fort Worth 1991, no pet); Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex.App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Samuel Gonzalez IV v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) John Madison Hughes v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Keith Garrett Kerr v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Francis Edmundo Lopez v. State
Tex. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Carlos R. Quinteros v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ricky Garcia v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cristobal Diaz Hernandez v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Victor Aguilar v. State
Tex. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
See Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Christopher Michael Langley v. State
Tex. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
Cf. Carroll v. State , 75 S.W.3d 633, 634 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
discussed Cited "see" Sherman Jerimaine Hunter v. the State of Texas
Tex. App. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (first citing Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); then citing Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 709 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.); and then citing TEX.
discussed Cited "see" Chikevia Rena Roberts v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 , 708– 09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.). 1 Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(4) provides that an appellate court may consider an appeal in a criminal case without briefs if the trial court has found that the appellant is not indigent but has not made the necessary arrangements for filing a brief, as justice may require.
cited Cited "see" Cheryl Ann Fultz v. State
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" Arquimides Gonzales Velasquez v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" John Lee Knight v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" Reginald Charles LeBlanc v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" Lathaniel Joseph Dalcour v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" Wesley Gerrald Davis v. State
Tex. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" Gamez, Heidi Lynn v. State
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" Morales, Yared Trejo v. State
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" Alam, Azhid Anwar v. State
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" Davis, Samuel Prophet v. State
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcroft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 709 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" McCann, Michael Andrew v. State
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see" Carroll v. State
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex.App.-Fort-Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 708 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" Alakhras v. State
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Jon Russell Sutherland, Jr. v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Ashcraft v. State , 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sutherland v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Ashcraft v. State, 802 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1991, no pet.); Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-09 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herbert R. ASHCRAFT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Texas, State
2-90-116-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas.
Jan 29, 1991.
802 S.W.2d 905
J.W. Tottenham (Deceased) Fort Worth, for appellant., Chris Marshall, Fort Worth, for the State.
Lattimore, Meyers, Day.
Cited by 38 opinions  |  Published

[*906] OPINION

LATTIMORE, Justice.

Herbert R. Ashcraft appeals from the trial court’s determination that he was guilty of injury to a child. See TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.04(a)(4) (Vernon Supp.1991). The trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at four years in the penitentiary, probated.

After the record was filed in this court, but before Ashcraft’s brief was due to be filed, we received information that his attorney had died. Therefore, we abated this appeal to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether Ashcraft desired to continue his appeal and for appointment of new counsel, if necessary. The trial court sent a letter to Ashcraft, advising him of the time and date of the hearing on abatement, but the letter was returned, marked “NO SUCH ADDRESS.” The trial court then scheduled another hearing, and sent a copy of the notice letter to Ashcraft at three separate addresses. Ashcraft did not appear at the hearing, but he called the trial court coordinator after the time scheduled for the hearing. The court coordinator told Ashcraft to be in court the following Monday morning, but he failed to appear. The trial court concluded that appellant had abandoned his appeal.

After our court received the supplemental record evidencing these proceedings in the trial court, we ordered Ashcraft to file a brief on or before November 19,1990 and we further ordered that the appeal be submitted without briefs if he did not do so. Additionally, we ordered Ashcraft to furnish his current address and phone number to this court. A copy of this order was sent to Ashcraft at the three addresses the trial court used, as well as another possible address that we found in the record. Ash-craft has made no response to the order. Under these circumstances, we conclude that we should submit this appeal without briefs, and review the record for fundamental error. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708, 708-709 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.); Allen v. State, 730 S.W.2d 374, 375-376 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987, no pet.); Roblow v. State, 729 S.W.2d 358, 359 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987, no pet.); TEX.R.APP.P. 74(Z); see also Coleman v. State, 774 S.W.2d 736, 737-739 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, no pet.), where the court of appeals reviewed the record for “reversible error.”

We have reviewed the indictment and note that it charges Ashcraft with injury to a child in the terms of the statute authorizing conviction. See TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.04(a)(4). Ashcraft was charged with having caused bodily injury to a child under age 15 by striking him with his fist and throwing him against a brick wall. The eleven-year-old victim testified that Ashcraft grabbed him, threw him against a brick wall, and banged his head against the wall four times. He said he lost consciousness for five to ten seconds after the assault. Ashcraft testified that he pushed the victim against the wall and the victim’s head bounced against the wall, even though he had not intended this result. However, Ashcraft admitted that he intentionally hit the boy’s head against the wall a second time. We conclude that this evidence is sufficient to show that Ashcraft intentionally or knowingly caused bodily injury to a child under the age of 15 years.

We have reviewed the entire record and find that there is no fundamental error. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.