green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2019–2020 ·
…it is a well established rule of trial procedure that a district court may reconsider and reverse a previous interlocutory order at its discretion.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jackson v. Standard Mortgage Corp
it is a well established rule of trial procedure that a district court may reconsider and reverse a previous interlocutory order at its discretion.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Magee v. B P X Properties (N A) L P
it is a well established rule of trial procedure that a district court may reconsider and reverse a previous interlocutory order at its discretion.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
My Thi Nhu Tran, et al. v. Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Co., et al.
P. 54(b). 36 Holoway v. Triola, 172 F.3d 866, at *1 (5th Cir. 1999) (per curiam). 37 Austin v. Kroger Tex., L.P., 864 F.3d 326, 336 (5th Cir. 2017) (quoting Lavespere v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, Inc., 910 F.2d 167, 185 (5th Cir. 1990)). 38 S. Snow Mfg.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Archer Western Contractors, LLC v. McDonnel Group, LLC
P. 54(b). 21 Holoway v. Triola, 172 F.3d 866, at *1 (5th Cir. 1999) (per curiam). 22 S. Snow Mfg.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Antoine's Restaurant, L.L.C. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Co., L.L.C., 24 F.4th 1005, 1009 (5th Cir. 2022) (“[O]rders compelling arbitration that stay and administratively close a civil action pending arbitration are interlocutory and unappealable.”). 12 Holoway v. Triola, 172 F.3d 866, at *1 (5th Cir. 1999) (per curiam). 13 Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. U.S. E.P.A.
See, e.g., Perdue v. FAA , 172 F.3d 866 (5th Cir. 1999) ("This court shall set aside agency action that is 'arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.' " (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A) )); Checkosky v. SEC , 23 F.3d 452 , 491 (D.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Torres
v.
Johnson
v.
Johnson
Torres
v.
Johnson
NO. 97-20635
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
February 01, 1999
Appeal From: S.D.Tex. , No.H-88-CV-1960
1
Affirmed.