State v. Davis, 304 S.W.3d 199 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Davis, 304 S.W.3d 199 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. WILLIAM E. COPHER (moctapp, 2015-03-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. WILLIAM E. COPHER
Mo. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
Clair, 261 S.W.2d 75, 77 (Mo. 1953), referred to the former Habitual Criminal Statute, section 556.290, RSMo 1949, which contained the phrases “any of the United States” and “which, if committed in this state[,]” as “dealing with offenses committed in other states.” Defendant reasons that “[j]ust as the Habitual Criminal Statute, Section 556.290 (1949), combined the phrase ‘any of the United States’ with ‘which, if committed in this state’ to deal with offenses committed in other states, § 565.074 combines ‘any state’ with ‘which, if committed in this state’ to d…
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Minner
Mo. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
State v. Nibarger, 304 S.W.3d 199, 201 (Mo.App.
discussed Cited "see" State of Missouri v. Russell Allen Renfrow, Jr. (2×)
Mo. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nibarger, 304 S.W.3d 199 , 205 n. 4 (Mo. App. W.D. 2009) (defendant challenged conviction for two counts of child molestation for one act, the court declined to review for plain error but noted, in dicta, that the sentences "were ordered to run concurrent, suggesting an absence of manifest injustice.").
cited Cited "see" STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. TERISA L. STEPHENS
Mo. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nibarger, 304 S.W.3d 199 , 205 n. 5 (Mo.App.
cited Cited "see" State v. Gray
Mo. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nibarger, 304 S.W.3d 199, 201 (Mo.App.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. THAISEN PAUL OLLERICH
Mo. Ct. App. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See also State v. Nibarger, 304 S.W.3d 199, 204-05 (Mo.App. 2009) (declining plain error review of alleged double jeopardy violation as to two counts of child molestation where child molestation convictions required proof of “sexual contact,” which was defined as “any touching . . . .”) (“Though the alleged offenses occurred in the same episode . . . each alleged offense required proof of a fact not required by the other.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Ronald E. DAVIS, Jr., Appellant
WD 69388.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Dec 8, 2009.
304 S.W.3d 199
K. Kate Webber, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., and Daniel N. McPherson, Esq. Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Ahuja, Smart, Hardwick.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ronald E. Davis appeals his conviction of burglary in the first degree, § 569.160, RSMo 2000, unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.080, and resisting arrest, § 575.150, following a jury trial in the Jackson County Circuit Court. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).