State v. Hardy, 863 A.2d 699 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Hardy, 863 A.2d 699 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Grant (conn, 2009-11-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Grant
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hardy, 272 Conn. 906 , 863 A.2d 699 (2004). *159 On appeal to this court, Hardy raised the following argument in support of his claim that only guns that discharge their shots by gunpowder are deadly weapons.
discussed Cited "see" State v. PEDRO S. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rowe, 85 Conn. App. 563, 574-75 , 858 A.2d 792 , cert, granted on other grounds, 272 Conn. 906 , 863 A.2d 699 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Raymond Hardy
SC 17324.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 8, 2004.
863 A.2d 699
Deborah G. Stevenson, special public defender, in support of the petition., Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 708 (AC 23960), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does a ‘firearm’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (19) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?
“2. Does a ‘deadly weapon’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (6) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?”
[*907] Decided December 8, 2004 Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.