Hollister v. Thomas, 961 A.2d 419 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
Hollister v. Thomas, 961 A.2d 419 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Condron (connappct, 2018-04-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Condron
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Goduto , 110 Conn. App. 367 , 955 A.2d 544 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 956 , 961 A.2d 420 (2008) ; Twenty-Four Merrill Street Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Murray , 96 Conn. App. 616 , 902 A.2d 24 (2006) ; Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, supra, 72 Conn. App. at 700 , 807 A.2d 968 . 15 Those cases cited are factually distinguishable, as they all involved the application of the doctrine of substantial compliance to the contents of the notice itself.
discussed Cited "see" Sepega v. DeLaura Concurrence (2×)
Conn. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hollister v. Thomas , 110 Conn.App. 692 , 703-704, 955 A.2d 1212 (concluding that homeowner owed no duty to firefighter, injured when jumping from fire truck, to have reported fire more promptly), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 956 , 961 A.2d 419 (2008) ; Demers v. Rosa , 102 Conn.App. 497 , 505-506 n.6, 925 A.2d 1165 (stating that policy considerations disfavor allowing police officer, injured in fall after recovering roaming dog, to bring negligence lawsuit against dog's owner, as existing statutory penalties provide "substantial incentive for dog owners to take appropriate precautions"), cert.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ronald HOLLISTER
v.
Edna THOMAS et al. Ronald Hollister v. Action Construction, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 3, 2008.
961 A.2d 419
Published

Hope C. Seeley, Hartford, and Sandra Snaden Kuwaye, in support of the petition.

J. Kevin Golger, Bridgeport, Karen K. Clark and Frank G. Usseglio, Hartford, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 110 Conn.App. 692, 955 A.2d 1212 (2008), is denied.