Schwartz v. Fam. Dental Grp., P.C., 954 A.2d 184 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
Schwartz v. Fam. Dental Grp., P.C., 954 A.2d 184 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Deleo v. Equale & Cirone, LLP (connappct, 2021-02-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Deleo v. Equale & Cirone, LLP
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schwartz v. Family Dental Group, P.C., 106 Conn. App. 765 , 772–73, 943 A.2d 1122 , cert. denied, 288 Conn. 911 , 954 A.2d 184 (2008); Yellow Page Consultants, Inc. v. Omni Home Health Services, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 194, 199 , 756 A.2d 309 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Kearney v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn. App. 201, 206 , 947 A.2d 435 , cert. denied, 288 Conn. 911 , 953 A.2d 652 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Moye v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn. App. 201, 205-206 , 947 A.2d 435 , cert. denied, 288 Conn. 911 , 953 A.2d 652 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pagan v. Smith
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
The claim of ineffective assistance of habeas coun- sel, when added to the claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, results in a different issue.’’ Id., 844 ; see also Harris v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn. App. 201, 209 , 947 A.2d 435 (‘‘[b]ecause [the peti- tioner] challenges the effectiveness of his prior habeas counsel, which also challenges the validity of his under- lying conviction, the ground he asserts is different from the previous grounds asserted in his prior habeas peti- tions, the petition is not barred as successive’’), cert. denied, 288 Conn. 911 ,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cator v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Although it is true that a petitioner seeking to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of habeas counsel must establish both that his appointed habeas counsel and trial counsel were ineffective; see, e.g., Harris v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn. App. 201, 206 , 947 A.2d 435 , cert. denied, 288 Conn. 911 , 953 A.2d 652 (2008); it does not follow that the res judicata dismissal of a freestanding count of ineffective assistance of trial counsel automatically precludes a petitioner from pro- ceeding on, and prevailing on the merits of, a separate claim of ineffective assistance of h…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cator v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Although it is true that a petitioner seeking to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of habeas counsel must establish both that his appointed habeas counsel and trial counsel were ineffective; see, e.g., Harris v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn. App. 201, 206 , 947 A.2d 435 , cert. denied, 288 Conn. 911 , 953 A.2d 652 (2008); it does not follow that the res judicata dismissal of a freestanding count of ineffective assistance of trial counsel automatically precludes a petitioner from pro- ceeding on, and prevailing on the merits of, a separate claim of ineffective assistance of h…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Steven Schwartz
v.
Family Dental Group, P.C., Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 17, 2008.
954 A.2d 184
David T. Grudberg, in support of the petition., Stuart M. Katz andBarbaraM. Schellenberg, in opposition.
Schaller.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 Conn. App. 765 (AC 27880), is denied.

SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.