United States v. Falcone, 72 F.3d 121 (1st Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
United States v. Falcone, 72 F.3d 121 (1st Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Falcone
95-1026.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Dec 7, 1995.
72 F.3d 121
Unpublished

72 F.3d 121

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
Joseph FALCONE, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 95-1026.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Dec. 7, 1995.

William A. Hahn and Hahn & Matkov on brief for appellant.

Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, Helene Kazanjian, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and George T. Dilworth, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.

Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, STAHL and LYNCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Having carefully reviewed the parties' briefs and the record, we affirm the judgment. Contrary to appellant's suggestion, the Sentencing Guidelines explicitly provide that "uncounseled misdemeanor sentences where imprisonment was not imposed" are "to be counted in the criminal history score." U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.2 comment. (backg'd). Falcone's constitutional challenge was rejected by the Supreme Court in Nichols v. United States, 114 S.Ct. 1921 (1994). Accordingly, the district court committed no error, much less plain error, in computing appellant's criminal history score. Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1.