Twomey v. United States, 99 F.3d 1128 (1st Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Twomey v. United States, 99 F.3d 1128 (1st Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Zarba v. The Town of Oak Bluffs (mad, 2020-08-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Zarba v. The Town of Oak Bluffs
D. Mass. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dupont v. Dubois, 99 F.3d 1128 (1st Cir. 1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Melendez-Rivera
1st Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Restrepo-Contreras v. United States, 99 F.3d 1128 (1st Cir.1996) (per curiam) (table), full text at 1996 WL 636560, at *1 .
cited Cited "see" Dupont v. Dubois
1st Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See DuPont v. Dubois, 99 F.3d 1128 , 1996 WL 649340 (1st Cir. 1996) (unpublished per curiam).
cited Cited "see" Dupont v. Weld
1st Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See DuPont v. Dubois, 99 F.3d 1128 , 1996 WL 649340 (1st Cir. 1996) (unpublished per curiam).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shumow v. Keolis Commuter Services, LLC
D. Mass. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Co., 301 Mass. 361, 363 (1938); see also Cleveland v. Hasbro, Inc., No. 96-1073, 99 F.3d 1128 at *2-4 (1st Cir. 1996) (Unpublished) (“Matters of proximate cause and comparative fault are, as a general rule, for the jury; but the settled exception to the general rule applies when a reasonable jury could reach only one result.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Twomey
v.
United States
96-1383.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Oct 28, 1996.
99 F.3d 1128
Unpublished

99 F.3d 1128

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Stephen C. TWOMEY, Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent, Appellee.

No. 96-1383.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Oct. 28, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]

Paul Twomey and Twomey & Sisti Law Offices on brief for appellant.

Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Timothy Q. Feeley, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

D.Mass.

AFFIRMED.

Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, BOUDIN and LYNCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Stephen T. Twomey appeals from the district court's dismissal of his petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We summarily affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Blais, No. 95-1093, slip op. (1st Cir. August 28, 1996).

2

Appellant's § 2255 petition is denied. See Loc. R. 27.1.