discussed Cited "see" Orozco v. Clark See Sims v. Rowland, 414 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.) (“Although the statutory formulation restricts federal law to Supreme Court precedent, ... 'Ninth Circuit precedent may be persuasive authority for purposes of determining whether a particular state court decision is an unreasonable application of Supreme Court law [under the AED-PA], and may also help us determine what law is clearly established.’ ”), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1066 , 126 S.Ct. 809 , 163 L.Ed.2d 637 (2005). 11 .

cited Cited "see" Green v. Johnson See Green v. True, 546 U.S. 1066 , 126 S.Ct. 809 , 163 L.Ed.2d 636 (2005).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Torricellas v. Davison Although Hill involved the quantum of evidence necessary to satisfy due process when a prison disciplinary board revokes good time credits, the Ninth Circuit has repeatedly applied Hill to parole cases, concluding "the Supreme Court ha[s] clearly established that a parole board’s decision deprives a prisoner of due process with respect to [his protected liberty] interest if the board's decision is not supported by 'some evidence in the record!.]' ” Irons, 505 F.3d at 850 ; Sass, 461 F.3d at 1128-29 ; Rosas, 428 F.3d at 1232-33 ; see also Sims v. Rowland, 414 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.2005) …