green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Association for Retarded Citizens of ND v. Olson
But see, Sanchez v. New Mexico, 396 U.S. 276 , 90 S.Ct. 588 , 24 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970) (appeal claiming right to least restrictive alternatives to institutionalization dismissed for lack of a federal question).
discussed
Cited "see"
Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. Partnership
See Swain v. Bd. of Adjust., 433 S.W.2d 727, 731 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1968, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (noting that board of adjustment acts as a quasi-judicial body when acting on variance requests and has no power to legislate), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 277 , 90 S.Ct. 563 , 24 L.Ed.2d 465 (1970); see also Wende v. Bd. of Adjust., 27 S.W.3d 162, 167 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2000, pet. granted) (holding that, as a quasi-judicial body, board of adjustment “has no discretion in determining what the law is or in applying the law to the facts”). 16 .
examined
Cited "see"
Lauderback v. State
(3×)
See Hurley v. Hinckley, 304 F.Supp. 704, 708 (D.Mass.1969), aff'd, 396 U.S. 277 , 90 S.Ct. 603 , 24 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970); Deeds v. State, 474 S.W.2d 718, 720 (Tex.Crim.App.1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murmur Corp. v. BD. OF ADJ., CITY OF DALLAS
(2×)
Accord Swain v. Board of Adjustment of University Park, 433 S.W.2d 727, 731 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1968, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 277 , 90 S.Ct. 563 , 24 L.Ed.2d 465 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Thornton
Accord, Dearinger v. United States, 378 F.2d 346, 347 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 885 , 88 S.Ct. 156 , 19 L.Ed.2d 183 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1030 , 90 S.Ct. 603 , 24 L.Ed.2d 525 , reh. denied, 397 U.S. 1004 , 90 S.Ct. 1132 , 25 L.Ed.2d 417 (1967); United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837, 841 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 408 , 15 L.Ed.2d 355 (1965); United States v. White, 342 F.2d 379, 381 (4th Cir. 1965) (“fact that the authorities apparently relied upon an invalid arrest warrant would not invalidate the arrest and the search and seizures which took place as inciden…
cited
Cited "see"
Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital
See State v. Sanchez, 80 N.M. 438 , 457 P.2d 370 (1968) (mentally ill), Dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 396 U.S. 276 , 90 S.Ct. 588 , 24 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital
See State v. Sanchez, 80 N.M. 438 , 457 P.2d 370 (1968) (mentally ill), dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 396 U.S. 276 , 90 S.Ct. 588 , 24 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970).
examined
Cited "see"
Government of the Canal Zone v. Jose Castillo L. (Lopez)
(3×)
See Hurley v. Hinckley, D.Mass., 1969, 304 F.Supp. 704 , aff’d sub. nom., Doyle v. O’Brien, 1970, 396 U.S. 277 , 90 S.Ct. 603 , 24 L.Ed.2d 469 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DOYLE ET AL.
v.
O'BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, ET AL.
v.
O'BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, ET AL.
1123, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1970.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 42 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
Edward J. Duggan for appellants.
Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, John Wall, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence P. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.