green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Durham County
See American Smelting & Refining Co. v. County of Contra Costa, 396 U. S. 273 (1970); Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U. S., at 344 . 21 It is irrelevant that the warehouses in American Smelting were Class 7 customs-bonded warehouses designed “for smelting and refining imported metal-bearing materials for exportation or domestic consumption,” 19 CFR § 19.1 (7) (1986); see also 19 U. S. C. § 1312 (a), and different from the Class 2 and Class 8 warehouses at issue here.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AMERICAN SMELTING & REFINING CO.
v.
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ET AL.
v.
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ET AL.
656.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1970.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT.
Valentine Brookes, Alexander J. Gillespie, Jr., C. Rudolf Peterson, and George W. Beatty for appellant.
John B. Clausen for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.