Travis v. Preston, 645 N.W.2d 342 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Travis v. Preston, 645 N.W.2d 342 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Scholma v. Ottawa County Road Commission (michctapp, 2013-10-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Scholma v. Ottawa County Road Commission (2×)
Mich. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
Travis, 249 Mich App at 343.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Lima Twp v. Bateson (4×) also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Mich. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
However, “[u]nder the RTFA, a farm or farming operation cannot be found to be a nuisance if it meets certain criteria... .” Travis, 249 Mich App at 342-343 (emphasis added).
cited Cited "see" Rudolph T Stonisch III v. Forthright IV LLC
Mich. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Travis v Preston (On Rehearing), 249 Mich App 338 , 348; 643 NW2d 235 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Gabriela N Nolen v. Estate of Charles L Laura
Mich. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Travis v Preston, 249 Mich App 338, 352 ; 643 NW2d 235 (2002) (applying MCL 125.294, the substantially similar predecessor to MCL 125.3407, and stating that “abatement of the nuisance is the only remedy the statue makes available to the court”).
discussed Cited "see" Gabriela N Nolen v. Estate of Charles L Laura
Mich. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Travis v Preston, 249 Mich App 338, 352 ; 643 NW2d 235 (2002) (applying MCL 125.294, the substantially similar predecessor to MCL 125.3407, and stating that “abatement of the nuisance is the only remedy the statue makes available to the court”).
cited Cited "see" Davis v. Chatman
Mich. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Travis, 249 Mich App at 349.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pete TRAVIS, Edna Travis, Richard Johnson, and Patricia Johnson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Keith PRESTON and Glenn Preston, d/b/a Preston Farms, Defendants-Appellants.
221756.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Apr 4, 2002.
645 N.W.2d 342
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

ORDER ENTERED JANUARY 22, 2002

Travis v. Preston, Docket No. 221756. This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion for rehearing. We grant rehearing and vacate our previous opinion released for publication, 247 Mich.App. 190, 635 N.W.2d 362 (2001). A new opinion, Travis v. Preston (On Rehearing), is released in conjunction with this order.