How cited: Travis v. Preston · Go Syfert

Travis v. Preston (2002)

green · 25 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200220142026
green Lima Twp v. Bateson (2013)
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
However, “[u]nder the RTFA, a farm or farming operation cannot be found to be a nuisance if it meets certain criteria... .” Travis, 249 Mich App at 342-343 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Travis, 249 Mich App at 343.
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Travis v Preston (On Rehearing), 249 Mich App 338 , 348; 643 NW2d 235 (2002).
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Travis v Preston, 249 Mich App 338, 352 ; 643 NW2d 235 (2002) (applying MCL 125.294, the substantially similar predecessor to MCL 125.3407, and stating that “abatement of the nuisance is the only remedy the statue makes available to the court”).
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Travis v Preston, 249 Mich App 338, 352 ; 643 NW2d 235 (2002) (applying MCL 125.294, the substantially similar predecessor to MCL 125.3407, and stating that “abatement of the nuisance is the only remedy the statue makes available to the court”).
green Davis v. Chatman (2011)
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Travis, 249 Mich App at 349.