green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. CLAUDIO C.
See State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72, 79 , 891 A.2d 67 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Davis
Because the record does not reflect either that the defendant sought to conduct further cross-examination of the victim after Miller testified or that the court in any way restricted the defendant’s rights to cross-examine the victim; see State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72 , 79 n.2, *197 891 A.2d 67 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006); we conclude that his claim must fail under the third prong of Golding .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gonzalez
See State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72, 78 , 891 A.2d 67 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cromety
See State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72, 76-79 , 891 A.2d 67 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ampero
See, e.g., State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72, 79, 891 A.2d 67 (“[t]he defendant can not raise a constitutional claim by attaching a constitutional label to a purely evidentiary claim or by asserting merely that a strained connection exists between the evidentiary claim and a fundamental constitutional right”), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Quentin V. STEPNEY.
v.
Quentin V. STEPNEY.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 16, 2006.
Published
Andrew Stephen Knott, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn.App. 72, 891 A.2d 67 (2006), is denied.