Heussner v. Day, Berry & Howard, LLP, 899 A.2d 38 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Heussner v. Day, Berry & Howard, LLP, 899 A.2d 38 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (55 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Byrne v. Burke (connappct, 2009-01-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Byrne v. Burke (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Heussner v. Day, Berry & Howard, LLP, 94 Conn. App. 569 , 579 n.4, 893 A.2d 486 (court barred negligent infliction of emotional distress count because count was predicated on facts identical to malicious prosecution count, which was barred by collateral estoppel), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 912 , 899 A.2d 38 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Giannamore v. Shevchuk (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ultimately, [t]he decision to set aside a verdict entails the exercise of a broad legal discretion . . . that, in the absence of clear abuse, we shall not disturb.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Embalmers’ Supply Co. v. Giannitti, 103 Conn. App. 20, 32-33 , 929 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 931 , 934 A.2d 246 (2007); see also Edmands v. CUNO, Inc., 277 Conn. 425, 452-53 , 892 A.2d 938 (2006). 7 We recently have described this element as “the gravamen of the tort." Heussner v. Day, Berry & Howard, LLP, 94 Conn. App. 569, 577 , 893 A.2d 486 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 912 , 899 A.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ragin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 917 (1968); see also Barlow v. Lopes, 201 Conn. 103, 112 , 513 A.2d 132 (1986) (‘[i]t is well established that since collateral legal disabilities are imposed as a matter of law because of a criminal conviction, a case will not be declared moot even where the sentence has been fully served’); State v. Falcon, 84 Conn. App. 429 , 431 n.3, 853 A.2d 607 (2004) (same); see also State v. Scott, 83 Conn. App. 724, 727 , 851 A.2d 353 (2004) (same).” State v. Briggs, 94 Conn. App. 722 , 725 n.4, 894 A.2d 1008 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 912 , 899 A.2d 39 (2006). 2 We note that despite the d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Janet Heussner
v.
Day, Berry and Howard, LLP, Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 16, 2006.
899 A.2d 38
John R. Williams, in support of the petition., Anthony M. Fitzgerald and David S. Hardy, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 569 (AC 26461), is denied.

BORDEN and PALMER, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[*913] John R. Williams, in support of the petition. Anthony M. Fitzgerald and David S. Hardy, in opposition. Decided May 16, 2006