green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Daniel G.
(4×)
See State v. Vilchel, 112 Conn. App. 411, 434 , 963 A.2d 658 , cert. denied, 291 Conn. 907 , 969 A.2d 173 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jorge P.
See State v. Vilchel, 112 Conn. App. 411, 439-40 , 963 A.2d 658 (“a court’s use of the term victim during its charge may deprive a defendant of his due process right to a fair trial”), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 907 , 969 A.2d 173 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Traystman v. Traystman
(2×)
See General Statutes § 46b-62 (“the court may order either spouse ... to pay the reasonable attorney’s fees of the other in accordance with their respective financial abilities and the criteria set forth in section 46b-82”); see also Utz v. Utz, 112 Conn. App. 631, 641-42 , 963 A.2d 1049 (court’s allocation of attorney’s fees to defendant appropriate where spouses had disparate earning capacities and where requiring plaintiff to pay her own attorney’s fees would have “undermine [d] the purposes” of other financial orders), cert, denied, 291 Conn. 908 , 969 A.2d 173 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lorraine A. Utz
v.
Peter D. Utz, Sr.
v.
Peter D. Utz, Sr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 8, 2009.
Lori Welch-Rubin, in support of the petition., John F. Morris, in opposition.
McLACHLAN.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 112 Conn. App. 631 (AC 28780), is denied.
McLACHLAN, J.,did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.