United States v. Pac. Abstract Title Co., a Corp., 192 F.2d 934 (9th Cir. 1951). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Pac. Abstract Title Co., a Corp., 192 F.2d 934 (9th Cir. 1951). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Harper v. Commissioner (tax, 1970-05-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Harper v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1970 · confidence medium
Where there is no threat of criminal prosecution, a person may not claim the privilege, even if testifying may cause him to lose his job, *1138 Pfitzinger v. Civil Service Commission , 96 F. Supp. 1 (D.N.J. 1951) , affirmed per curiam 192 F. 2d 934 *172 (C.A. 3, 1951); or his citizenship, DaCosta v. Holland , 151 F. Supp. 746 (E.D.
cited Cited "see" Title & Trust Co. v. United States
M.D. Fla. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Title & Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 15 T.C. 510 , aff’d per curiam 192 F.2d 934 (9 Cir.); Washington Title Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Pacific Abstract Title Company, a Corporation
12894.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 11, 1951.
192 F.2d 934
Published

192 F.2d 934

52-1 USTC P 9149

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
PACIFIC ABSTRACT TITLE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 12894.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 11, 1951.

Ellis N. Slack, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Harry Marselli and Leland T. Atherton, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Henry L. Hess, U.S. Atty., Victor E. Harr, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellant.

Will H. Masters, Wm. J. Masters, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed on the authority of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Title & Trust Co., 9 Cir., 192 F.2d 934, affirming 15 T.C. 510.