Kopylec v. Town of North Branford, 28 A.3d 346 (Conn. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Kopylec v. Town of North Branford, 28 A.3d 346 (Conn. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Reardon v. Zoning Board of Appeals (conn, 2014-04-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Reardon v. Zoning Board of Appeals (2×) also: Cited "see"
Conn. · 2014 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
For the reasons set forth later in this opinion, however, the resolution of this appeal does not turn on the factual significance of any particular action or omission by Keating; cf. id., 426; but on the legal characteristics of a ‘‘decision’’ as that term is used in § 8-6 (a) and related regulations and as applied to the facts read in the light most favorable to sustaining the board’s decision.
discussed Cited "see" Ibar v. Stratek Plastic Ltd. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kopylec v. North Branford, 130 Conn. App. 146 , 148 n.1, 23 A.3d 51 , cert. granted on other grounds, 302 Conn. 930 , 28 A.3d 346 (2011) (appeal withdrawn March 14, 2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph KOPYLEC
v.
TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD.
SC 18852.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2011.
28 A.3d 346
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Vincent T. McManus, Jr., Wallingford, in support of the petition.

John M. Gesmonde, Hamden, in opposition.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 130 Conn.App. 146, 23 A.3d 51, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's denial of the plaintiffs application to discharge the lien of the town of North Branford?"

EVELEIGH and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.