green
Positive treatment
Trending · 143 recent citers
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rivera v. Rivera
“It is well settled that a spouse is entitled to a credit for his or her contribution of separate property toward the purchase of the marital residence . . . , including any contributions that are directly traceable to separate property” (Juhasz v Juhasz, 59 AD3d 1023, 1024 [2009], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 848 [2009]; see also Salvato v Salvato, 89 AD3d 1509, 1510 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 811 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
RIVERA, LYNN v. RIVERA, MICHAEL L.
“It is well settled that a spouse is entitled to a credit for his or her contribution of separate property toward the purchase of the marital residence . . . , including any contributions that are directly traceable to separate property” (Juhasz v Juhasz, 59 AD3d 1023, 1024 , lv dismissed 12 NY3d 848 ; see also Salvato v Salvato, 89 AD3d 1509, 1510 , lv denied 18 NY3d 811 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rivera v. Rivera
“It is well settled that a spouse is entitled to a credit for his or her contribution of separate property toward the purchase of the marital residence . . . , including any contributions that are directly traceable to separate property” (Juhasz v Juhasz, 59 AD3d 1023, 1024 [2009], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 848 [2009]; see also Salvato v Salvato, 89 AD3d 1509, 1510 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 811 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Samantha M.
The certification stated that the document “was within the scope of the entrant’s business duty to record the act, transaction or occurrence sought to be admitted” and that each participant in the chain producing the record was acting within the course of regular business conduct (Matter of Leon RR, 48 NY2d 117, 122-123 [1979]; see also Matter of Shirley A.S. [David A.S.], 90 AD3d 1655, 1655 [4th Dept 2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 811 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Samantha M.
The certification stated that the document “was within the scope of the entrant’s business duty to record the act, transaction or occurrence sought to be admitted” and that each participant in the chain producing the record was acting within the course of regular business conduct (Matter of Leon RR, 48 NY2d 117, 122-123 [1979]; see also Matter of Shirley A.S. [David A.S.], 90 AD3d 1655, 1655 [4th Dept 2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 811 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Moss
The court, however, properly concluded that, because defendant had convictions for two prior sex offenses, he is nevertheless a level three risk based on the presumptive override for a prior felony conviction of a sex crime (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 3-4 [2006]; People v Barnes, 34 AD3d 1227, 1227-1228 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 803 [2007]; see also People v Iverson, 90 AD3d 1561, 1562 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 811 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Moss
The court, however, properly concluded that, because defendant had convictions for two prior sex offenses, he is nevertheless a level three risk based on the presumptive override for a prior felony conviction of a sex crime (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 3-4 [2006]; People v Barnes, 34 AD3d 1227, 1227-1228 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 803 [2007]; see also People v Iverson, 90 AD3d 1561, 1562 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 811 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MOSS, DWIGHT, PEOPLE v
The court, however, properly concluded that, because defendant had convictions for two prior sex offenses, he is nevertheless a level three risk based on the presumptive override for a prior felony conviction of a sex crime (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 3-4 [2006]; People v Barnes, 34 AD3d 1227, 1227-1228 , lv denied 8 NY3d 803 ; see also People v Iverson, 90 AD3d 1561, 1562 , lv denied 18 NY3d 811 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
IVERSON.
v.
IVERSON.
Motion No: 2012-185.
New York Court of Appeals.
Apr 26, 2012.
968 N.E.2d 1001
Published
Motion for leave to appeal denied.