green
Positive treatment
Trending · 100 recent citers
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Daly v. New York City Off. of Mgt. & Budget
"Recognizing that application of this statute necessarily entails difficult line-drawing that leaves some without a potential recovery," we cannot conclude that the Board abused its discretion in finding that Workers' Compensation Law article 8-A does not apply to this claim ( Matter of Kearns v Decisions Strategies Envt. , 167 AD3d at 1199-1200 [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Williams v City of New York , 89 AD3d 1182, 1184 [3d Dept 2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 807 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Thomas GG. v. Bonnie Jean HH.
However, "the child's refusal of contact must be totally unjustified, and where it is the parent who causes a breakdown in communication with his or her child, the child will not be deemed to have abandoned the parent" ( Matter of McCloskey v McCloskey , 111 AD3d 1120, 1122 [2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets, ellipsis and citations omitted]; see Matter of Boccalino v Boccalino , 59 AD3d 901, 903 [2009]; see also Matter of Glen L.S. v Deborah A.S. , 89 AD3d 856, 858 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 807 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Allport
Thus, contrary to defendant’s contention, “[c]ounsel could have reasonably concluded that there was nothing to litigate at the hearing” (People v Reid, 59 AD3d 158, 159 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 708 [2009]; see People v Westfall, 114 AD3d 1264, 1264 [2014]; see also People v Bowles, 89 AD3d 171, 181 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 807 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ALLPORT, BRIAN, PEOPLE v
Thus, contrary to defendant’s contention, “[c]ounsel could have reasonably concluded that there was nothing to litigate at the hearing” (People v Reid, 59 AD3d 158, 159 , lv denied 12 NY3d 708 ; see People v Westfall, 114 AD3d 1264, 1264 ; see also People v Bowles, 89 AD3d 171, 181 , lv denied 18 NY3d 807 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Allport
Thus, contrary to defendant’s contention, “[c]ounsel could have reasonably concluded that there was nothing to litigate at the hearing” (People v Reid, 59 AD3d 158, 159 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 708 [2009]; see People v Westfall, 114 AD3d 1264, 1264 [2014]; see also People v Bowles, 89 AD3d 171, 181 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 807 [2012]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SOURCE ENTERS., INC.
v.
WINDELS MARX LANE & MITTENDORF, LLP.
v.
WINDELS MARX LANE & MITTENDORF, LLP.
Motion No: 2011-1368.
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 16, 2012.
963 N.E.2d 1264
Published
Motion for leave to appeal denied.