green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Violet S. David v. Lester S. Blumenthal
(2×)
See Blumenthal v. Blumenthal, 1960, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 93 , 274 F.2d 751 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Manuel BAKER, Appellant,
v.
Celia RADOW, Appellee
v.
Celia RADOW, Appellee
15147_1.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jan 7, 1960.
Mr. Allan C. Swingle, Washington, D. C. , for appellant., Mr. Arthur S. Feld, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Joseph D. Bulman and Sidney M. Goldstein, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Prettyman, Bazelon, Bastían.
Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment against him in appellee’s suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision. His primary point, that the court[*752] erred in refusing to direct a verdict in his favor, rests on his contention that some of the testimony against him was inherently incredible. We find no error.
Affirmed.