Matter of Anonymous, 962 N.E.2d 275 (NY 2012). · Go Syfert
Matter of Anonymous, 962 N.E.2d 275 (NY 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Graham v. Jones (nyappdiv, 2017-02-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Graham v. Jones
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
However, it is well settled that “the absence or possession of a driver’s license relates only to the authority for operating a vehicle, and not to its manner of operation” (Almonte v Marsha Operating Corp., 265 AD2d 357, 357 [1999]; see Huff v Rodriguez, 88 AD3d 1274, 1275 [2011], appeal dismissed 18 NY3d 869 [2012], lv denied 18 NY3d 919 [2012]; Firmes v Chase Manhattan Auto.
discussed Cited "see" GRAHAM, RAEQUEL L. v. JONES, CHARLESETA
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
However, it is well settled that “the absence or possession of a driver’s license relates only to the authority for operating a vehicle, and not to its manner of operation” (Almonte v Marsha Operating Corp., 265 AD2d 357, 357 ; see Huff v Rodriguez, 88 AD3d 1274, 1275 , appeal dismissed 18 NY3d 869 , lv denied 18 NY3d 919 ; Firmes v Chase Manhattan Auto.
discussed Cited "see" Graham v. Jones
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
However, it is well settled that “the absence or possession of a driver’s license relates only to the authority for operating a vehicle, and not to its manner of operation” (Almonte v Marsha Operating Corp., 265 AD2d 357, 357 [1999]; see Huff v Rodriguez, 88 AD3d 1274, 1275 [2011], appeal dismissed 18 NY3d 869 [2012], lv denied 18 NY3d 919 [2012]; Firmes v Chase Manhattan Auto.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Anonymous, an Attorney and Counselor-At-Law, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent
Motion No: 2011-1197.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 10, 2012.
962 N.E.2d 275
Published

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.