People v. Robinson, 896 N.E.2d 106 (NY 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Robinson, 896 N.E.2d 106 (NY 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (47 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Romano v. Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility (nyed, 2022-05-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Romano v. Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility
E.D.N.Y · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Romano, 896 N.E.2d 106 (N.Y. 2008), reconsideration denied, 900 N.E.2d 563 (N.Y. 2008).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Madden
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, we conclude that, “even if ‘defendant’s allocution did not establish the essential elements of the crime to which he pleaded guilty, it would not require vacatur of his plea since there is no suggestion in the record that the plea was improvident or baseless’ ” (People v O’Keefe, 170 AD2d 1020, 1020 [1991], lv denied 77 NY2d 965 [1991]; see People v Pratcher, 50 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 793 [2008]).
discussed Cited "see" MADDEN, III, MOSES, PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, we conclude that, “even if ‘defendant’s allocution did not establish the essential elements of the crime to which he pleaded guilty, it would not require vacatur of his plea since there is no suggestion in the record that the plea was improvident or baseless’ ” (People v O’Keefe, 170 AD2d 1020, 1020 , lv denied 77 NY2d 965 ; see People v Pratcher, 50 AD3d 1063, 1064 , lv denied 11 NY3d 793 ).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Madden
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, we conclude that, “even if ‘defendant’s allocution did not establish the essential elements of the crime to which he pleaded guilty, it would not require vacatur of his plea since there is no suggestion in the record that the plea was improvident or baseless’ ” (People v O’Keefe, 170 AD2d 1020, 1020 [1991], lv denied 77 NY2d 965 [1991]; see People v Pratcher, 50 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 793 [2008]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Hoffler
N.Y. App. Div. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
A court is required to summarily deny a motion to vacate a judgment where, “[although sufficient facts appear on the record of the proceedings underlying the judgment to have permitted, upon appeal from such judgment, adequate review of the ground or issue raised upon the motion, no such appellate review or determination oc curred owing to the defendant’s . . . unjustifiable failure to raise such ground or issue upon an appeal actually perfected by him” (CPL 440.10 [2] [c]; see People v Polanco, 52 AD3d 947 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 793 [2008]; People v Nicholson, 50 AD3d 1397, 1399 [200…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
ROBINSON (LATEE).
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 30, 2008.
896 N.E.2d 106
Published

Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (Ciparick, J.)