Kelly v. Kelly, 845 N.E.2d 1270 (NY 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Kelly v. Kelly, 845 N.E.2d 1270 (NY 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Morse v. Morse (nyappdiv, 2025-12-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Morse v. Morse
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
During the pendency of this appeal, the parties entered into a transcribed oral stipulation in open court that rendered the custodial issues raised on this appeal moot ( see Matter of Charles N.F. v Terry R.F. [appeal No. 1], 261 AD2d 884 , 884 [4th Dept 1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 814 [1999]; see generally Kelly v Kelly , 19 AD3d 1104 , 1106 [4th Dept 2005], appeal dismissed 5 NY3d 847 [2005], reconsideration denied 6 NY3d 803 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" Morse v. Morse
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
During the pendency of this appeal, the parties entered into a transcribed oral stipulation in open court that rendered the custodial issues raised on this appeal moot ( see Matter of Charles N.F. v Terry R.F. [appeal No. 1], 261 AD2d 884 , 884 [4th Dept 1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 814 [1999]; see generally Kelly v Kelly , 19 AD3d 1104 , 1106 [4th Dept 2005], appeal dismissed 5 NY3d 847 [2005], reconsideration denied 6 NY3d 803 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" Saylor v. Saylor
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
Contrary to defendant’s contention, Supreme Court “properly set forth the factors it considered in determining the amount [and duration]” of the maintenance award (McBride-Head v Head, 23 AD3d 1010, 1011 [2005]; see Kelly v Kelly, 19 AD3d 1104 , 1106 [2005], appeal dismissed 5 NY3d 847 [2005], rearg denied and lv dismissed in part and denied in part 6 NY3d 803 [2006]; McAllister v McAllister, 6 AD3d 1141 [2004]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marianne J. Kelly, Respondent,
v.
John M. Kelly, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 21, 2006.
845 N.E.2d 1270
Published

Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 27, 2005 dismissal order denied [see 5 NY3d 847]. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that modified Supreme Court’s April 2004 order and remitted for further proceedings, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.