People v. Almeda, 825 N.E.2d 136 (NY 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Almeda, 825 N.E.2d 136 (NY 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Mathis (nyappdiv, 2009-03-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Mathis
N.Y. App. Div. · 2009 · signal: accord · confidence high
The procedure will be deemed unduly suggestive only if it takes place “under circumstances which [are] ‘. . .so unnecessarily suggestive as to create a substantial likelihood of misidentification’ ” (People v Hughes, 287 AD2d 872, 875 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 656 [2001] [citation omitted]; accord People v Armstrong, 11 AD3d 721, 722 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 760 [2005]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
ALMEDA.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 27, 2005.
825 N.E.2d 136
Published

Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (Graffeo, J.) (upon reconsideration).