State v. Lanning, 187 P.3d 271 (Wash. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Lanning, 187 P.3d 271 (Wash. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“nrichment alone will not trigger the doctrine; the enrichment must be unjust under the circumstances and as between the two parties.”
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Davenport v. Washington Educ. Ass'n (washctapp, 2008-12-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Davenport v. Washington Educ. Ass'n
Wash. Ct. App. · 2008 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
nrichment alone will not trigger the doctrine; the enrichment must be unjust under the circumstances and as between the two parties.
discussed Cited "see" Grondal v. United States
E.D. Wash. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLC, 139 Wash.App. 560, 571 , 161 P.3d 473 (2007), review denied, 163 Wash.2d 1042 , 187 P.3d 269 (2008) (Mutual modification of a contract by subsequent agreement arises out of the intentions of the parties and requires a meeting of the minds and separate consideration); Wagner v. Wagner, 95 Wash.2d 94, 103 , 621 P.2d 1279 (1980); Hanson v. Puget Sound Navigation Co., 52 Wash.2d 124, 127, 323 P.2d 655 (1958).
discussed Cited "see" Fawn Lake Maintenance Com'n v. Abers
Wash. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLC, 139 Wash.App. 560, 571 , 161 P.3d 473 (2007), review denied, 163 Wash.2d 1042 , 187 P.3d 269 (2008) (citations omitted) (holding that contract modification requires meeting of the minds and separate consideration).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." David A. Skeels v. Jonathan T. Suder, Michael T. Cooke, and Friedman, Suder & Cooke, P.C.
Tex. App. · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., McCormick v. Dunn & Black, P.S., 167 P.3d 610, 619 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007) (“The courts do not have the power to make a stock redemption agreement where the parties failed to do so.”), review denied, 163 Wash. 2d 1042 (2008); Corlett, Killian, Hardeman, McIntosh and Levi, P.A. v. Merritt, 478 So.2d 828 , 829–35 (Fla. Dist.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
LANNING.
80790-6.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jun 4, 2008.
187 P.3d 271
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Washington (1)

Disposition of petition for review. Denied.