green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Advocates for Prattsburgh, Inc. v. Steuben County Industrial Development Agency
Oil Co. v City of New York, 5 NY2d 110, 117 [1958], rearg denied 5 NY2d 1041 [1959], cert denied 360 US 934 [1959]; see Weaver v Town of Rush, 1 AD3d 920, 923-924 [2003]; see also City of Buffalo v Clement Co., 28 NY2d 241, 255 [1971], rearg denied 29 NY2d 640 [1971]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dur-Bar Realty Co. v. City of Utica
The Court of Appeals has recognized that the requirement of a "comprehensive plan” for village zoning under section 177 of the former Village Law is not "equated * * * with any particular document” and "may be found both in the village’s zoning ordinance and in its zoning map” (Udell v Haas, 21 NY2d 463, 471-472 ; see, also, Daum v Meade, 65 Misc 2d 572, 575-576 , affd 37 AD2d 691 , app dsmd 29 NY2d 640 ; Walus v Millington, 49 Misc 2d 104, 108-109 , affd 31 AD2d 777 [interpreting "comprehensive plan” requirement for zoning under Town Law, § 263]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Buffalo, Appellant-Respondent,
v.
J. W. Clement Company, Inc., (Correct Corporate Name J. W. Clement Company), Respondent-Appellant, Et Al., Defendants
v.
J. W. Clement Company, Inc., (Correct Corporate Name J. W. Clement Company), Respondent-Appellant, Et Al., Defendants
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 7, 1971.
273 N.E.2d 315
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Motion to clarify the opinion of the Court of Appeals or, in the alternative, for reargument of the appeal denied. [See 28 N Y 2d 241.]