green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citibank (South Dakota) N. A. v. Ousterman
We do agree, however, with Capoccia’s assertion that Supreme Court failed to set forth the reasons why it found the amount of $250 to be appropriate, and the matter must be remitted to Supreme Court for that purpose (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.2; McCue v McCue, 225 AD2d 975, 979 ; see also, Matter of Rose BB., 262 AD2d 805, 807 , appeal and lv dismissed 93 NY2d 1039 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Rose BB. Richard BB., Appellant; Louis BB. Et Al., Respondents
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 23, 1999.
719 N.E.2d 920
Cited by 20 opinions | Published
On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Judge Ciparick taking no part.