Swartz & Funston, Inc. v. Bricklayers, Masons & Plasterers Int'l Union Of Am., 319 F.2d 116 (3rd Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Swartz & Funston, Inc. v. Bricklayers, Masons & Plasterers Int'l Union Of Am., 319 F.2d 116 (3rd Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wilkes-Barre Publishing Co. v. Newspaper Guild of Wilkes-Barre, Local 120 (pamd, 1980-06-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Wilkes-Barre Publishing Co. v. Newspaper Guild of Wilkes-Barre, Local 120
M.D. Penn. · 1980 · confidence medium
Although a stay is generally recognized as appropriate, see, e. g., Bechtel Corp. v. Local 215, Laborers’ International Union, 544 F.2d 1207, 1215 (3d Cir. 1976); Local 595, International Association of Machinists v. Howe Sound Co., 350 F.2d 508, 511 (3d Cir. 1965); Swartz & Funston, Inc. v. Bricklayers International Union, 319 F.2d 116, 117 (3d Cir. 1963) (per curiam), the circumstances of this case militate for dismissal.
discussed Cited "see" Local Lodge No 595 of District No. 152, International Ass'n of Machinists v. Howe Sound Co.
3rd Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Swartz & Funston, Inc. v. Bricklayers, Masons and Plasterers International Union of America, 319 F.2d 116 (3 Cir. 1963); Genesco, Inc. v. Joint Council 13, United Shoe Workers of America, 341 F.2d 482 (2 Cir. 1965); American Sugar Refining Co. v. The Anaconda, 138 F.2d 765 (5 Cir. 1943), aff’d without discussion of this issue, 322 U.S. 42 , 64 S.Ct. 863 , 88 L.Ed. 1117 (1944); Drake Bakeries v. Local 50, Amer.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." No. 15052
3rd Cir. · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Local No. 512, etc., supra, n. 4, 191 F.Supp. at 914 6 See Swartz & Funston, Inc. v. Bricklayers, Masons and Plasterers International Union of America, 319 F.2d 116 (3 Cir. 1963); Genesco, Inc. v. Joint Council 13, United Shoe Workers of America, 341 F.2d 482 (2 Cir. 1965); American Sugar Refining Co. v. The Anaconda, 138 F.2d 76 (5 Cir. 1943), aff'd without discussion of this issue, 322 U.S. 42 , 64 S.Ct. 863 , 88 L.Ed. 1117 (1944); Drake Bakeries v. Local 50, Amer.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swartz & Funston, Inc.
v.
Bricklayers, Masons and Plasterers International Union of America, Bricklayers Union Local No. 7 of New Jersey, and Anthony Previtera
14255.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 27, 1963.
319 F.2d 116
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

319 F.2d 116

SWARTZ & FUNSTON, INC., Appellant,
v.
BRICKLAYERS, MASONS AND PLASTERERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF
AMERICA, Bricklayers Union Local No. 7 of New
Jersey, and Anthony Previtera.

No. 14255.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 10, 1963.
Decided June 27, 1963.

Geoffrey J. Cunniff, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

David Seliger, Camden, N.J. (Plone, Tomar, Parks & Seliger, Camden, N.J., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal has been taken from an order dismissing an employer's complaint seeking damages from a labor union because of certain allegedly unlawful work stoppages. In dismissing the complaint, the district court ruled that the subject matter of the complaint was arbitrable under a collective bargaining agreement of the parties.

2

We agree that the matter in controversy should first be submitted to arbitration. However, we cannot now determine whether any judicial action on this claim will be appropriate after the arbitrators shall have acted upon the controversy in the light of the submissions of the parties and their own interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement.

3

Accordingly, we shall direct that the order dismissing the complaint be vacated and that action upon the complaint be stayed pending arbitration. Neither party shall be awarded costs as against the other on this appeal.