Anthony J. Celebrezze, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare v. Max E. Townsend, 327 F.2d 640 (5th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Anthony J. Celebrezze, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare v. Max E. Townsend, 327 F.2d 640 (5th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellant,
v.
Max E. TOWNSEND, Appellee
20862.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 29, 1964.
327 F.2d 640
Sherman L. Cohn, David J. McCarthy, Jr., Robert Y. Zener, Attys., Dept, of Justice, John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., William Wayne Justice, U. S. Atty., Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Tuttle, Hutcheson, Gewin.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This Court has, in the case of Cele-brezze v. O’Brient, 5 Cir., 323 F.2d 989, fully discussed the application of Section 216(i), 42 U.S.C.A. § 416(i), of the Social Security Act, and Section 223 of the Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 423, under which the appellee sought recovery here. Section 205(g) of the Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g), provides, “The findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence shall be conclusive * * Within the principles laid down in the O’Brient case, it is clear that there was substantial evidence to support the Secretary’s findings. It is also plain that the Secretary applied the correct legal principles. The district court’s conclusion to the contrary was in error.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for disposition in the light of this order.