green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. John T. Brown
United States v. Carrion, 463 F.2d 704,706 (9th Cir. 1972); Grogan v. United States, 394 F.2d 287 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 830 , 89 S.Ct. 97 , 21 L.Ed.2d 100 (1968); United States v. Stein, 327 F.2d 657, 658 (2d Cir. 1964).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Morgan v. United States
Upon a jury verdict of guilty, following an eight day trial, petitioner was sentenced on April 8, 1968 to concurrent four year terms of imprisonment on each of the three counts of the indictment. 2 The Court of Appeals (Chief Judge Lumbard and Circuit Judges Waterman and Friendly) unanimously affirmed the judgments of conviction on February 10, 1964 in a per curiam opinion stating, inter alia, that “There was abundant evidence to support the verdict of the jury with respect to each of the defendants, his part in causing the transportation of the women from Connecticut to New York, and his kn…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jose Martinez Mendoza v. United States
See Llamas v. United States, E.D.N.Y. 1963, 226 F.Supp. 351 , aff’d, 2 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 657 ; United States v. Jackson, 3 Cir. 1965, 344 F.2d 158 ; United States v. Dickerson, 6 Cir. 1964, 337 F.2d 343 ; Jackson v. United States, 8 Cir. 1963, 325 F.2d 477 ; Robison v. United States, 9 Cir. 1964, 329 F.2d 156 ; McDowell v. United States, 10 Cir. 1964, 330 F.2d 920 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1006 , 84 S.Ct. 1944 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1055 . 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rizzo
Compare Llamas v. United States, 226 F. Supp. 351 (E.D.N.Y.1963), aff’d., 327 F.2d 657 (2d Cir. 1964), where the identity of the purchaser of illegal narcotics was not named in an indictment against the seller.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Francisco Diaz Llamas
v.
Francisco Diaz Llamas
28554.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jan 24, 1964.
327 F.2d 657
Published
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Francisco Diaz LLAMAS, Appellant.
No. 279, Docket 28554.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 21, 1964.
Decided Jan. 24, 1964.
Francisco Diaz Llamas, pro se.
Joseph P. Hoey, U.S. Atty., Eastern District of New York (Michael J. Gillen, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Counsel), for appellee.
Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The denial of appellant's motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate the conviction which we affirmed in 280 F.2d 392 (2 Cir. 1960), is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Mishler.