Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gilvin-Terrill, Inc., 338 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1964).

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gilvin-Terrill, Inc., 338 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

No syfertize treatment data for this case.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
GILVIN-TERRILL, INC., Respondent

21203.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Dec 29, 1964.

338 F.2d 971

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

George H. Cohen, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Lee M. Modjeska, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner., H. M. Adkins, of Simpson, Adkins, Fullingim & Hankins, John Cosmic, Amarillo, Tex., for respondent.

Tuttle, Brown, Gewin.

Published

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for the enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board arising out of a finding by the Board that the respondent company had violated section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act ^[1] by refusing to bargain with the union certified as the representative of the company’s shop employees. The company refused to bargain for the asserted reason that the bargaining unit covered by the certification was inappropriate since it involved less than a eompanywide unit.

We are not convinced that the Board abused its discretion in determining the issue as to the appropriate bargaining unit.

The order will be enforced.

. 29 U.S.G.A. § 151 et seq.