green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Government of the Virgin Islands Ex Rel. Larsen v. Ruiz
(2×)
See, e.g., Marshall v. Lansing, 839 F.2d 933, 940 (3d Cir.1988) (remand to parole commission to reexamine its assignment of prisoner’s parole category and explain its reasoning if it reaffirms that category); Bachowski v. Usery, 545 F.2d 363, 371-73 (3d Cir.1976) (remand order interlocutory because it did not direct agency to take particular action but only to follow specified guidelines or standards, which contemplated further proceedings that could be reviewed on later appeal); Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467, 468 (3d Cir.1965) (remand of social security disability-benefits case to HE…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Brotherhood Of Maintenance Of Way Employees v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
See, e.g., Bachowski v. Usery, 545 F.2d 363, 371-73 (3d Cir.1976); Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467, 468 (3d Cir.1965) (per curiam).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
See, e.g., Bachowski v. Usery, 545 F.2d 363, 371-73 (3d Cir.1976); Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467, 468 (3d Cir.1965) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States of America, Cross-Appellant in No. 87-1777 v. Marcus Spears and Doris E. Spears. Appeal of Doris Spears, in No. 87-1735
(2×)
United Steelworkers of America, Local 1913 v. Union R.R., 648 F.2d 905, 909 (3d Cir.1981); Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467, 468 (3d Cir.1965).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Tulsa Area Hospital Council, Inc. v. Oral Roberts University
(2×)
Bohms v. Gardner, 381 F.2d 283, 285 [8th *323 Cir.1967]; Mayersky v. Celebrezze, 353 F.2d 89 [3rd Cir.1965]; Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467, 468 [3rd Cir.1965]. [1] My conclusion is that this appeal should have been dismissed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thelma R. Rutland v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
Guthrie v. Schweiker, 718 F.2d 104 (4th Cir.1983) (discussed in the context of an award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act); see Bohms v. Gardener, 381 F.2d 283 (8th Cir.1967) (Blackmun, J.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 964 (1968); Dalto v. Richardson, 434 F.2d 1018 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 979 (1971); Gilcrest v. Schweiker, 645 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1981); see also Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467 (3rd Cir.1965); Mayersky v. Celebrezze, 353 F.2d 89 (3d Cir.1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Steelworkers of America Local 1913 And/or Sam Godich v. Union Railroad Company
See, e. g., Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467, 468 (3d Cir. 1965) (remand of social security disability-benefits case to HEW Secretary to take additional evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Albert Brodka
See, e. g., Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467 (3d Cir. 1965); Whitehead v. Califano, 596 F.2d 1315 (6th Cir. 1979); Dalto v. Richardson, 434 F.2d 1018 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 979 , 91 S.Ct. 1211 , 28 L.Ed.2d 330 (1971); Bohms v. Gardner, 381 F.2d 283 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 964 , 88 S.Ct. 1069 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1164 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph P. Marshall
v.
Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America
v.
Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America
15226_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Oct 4, 1965.
Published
Joseph P. MARSHALL, Appellant,
v.
Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America.
No. 15226.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued September 23, 1965.
Decided October 4, 1965.
W. J. Krencewicz, Shenandoah, Pa., for appellant.
Morton Hollander, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U. S. Atty., Sherman L. Cohn, Edward Berlin, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The order from which this appeal has been taken is interlocutory, not final. It is unappealable. 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
2
The appeal will be dismissed.