United States v. Joseph Donato, 379 F.2d 288 (3rd Cir. 1967). · Go Syfert
United States v. Joseph Donato, 379 F.2d 288 (3rd Cir. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dawson v. State (texapp, 1994-03-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Dawson v. State
Tex. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Donato, 269 F.Supp. 921, 923 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 379 F.2d 288 (3d.
discussed Cited "see" American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service
S.D. Ohio · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Donato, 269 F.Supp. 921 , (E.D.Pa.) aff'd 379 F.2d 288 (3rd Cir.1967); United States v. Bunkers, 521 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 989 , 96 S.Ct. 400 , 46 L.Ed.2d 307 (1975); Los Angeles Police Protective League v. Gates, 579 F.Supp. 36, 44 (C.D.Cal.1984). 4.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Benn v. United States (2×)
D.C. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 228 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); see also Wehrle v. Brooks, 269 F.Supp. 785, 792 (W.D.N.C.1966) (“Positive identification of a person not previously known to the witness is perhaps the most fearful testimony known to file law of evidence.”), aff'd, 379 F.2d 288 (4th Cir.1967). .Webster v. United States, 623 A.2d 1198 , 1204 n. 15 (D.C. 1993) (quoting Crawley v. United States, 320 A.2d 309, 312 (D.C.1974)); see also Wade, 388 U.S. at 228 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 ("The vagaries of eyewitness identification are well known; the annals of criminal law ar…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Benn v. United States
D.C. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Wehrle v. Brooks, 269 F.Supp. 785, 792 (W.D.N.C.1966), aff'd, 379 F.2d 288 (4th Cir.1967) ("[pjositive identification of a person not previously known to the witness is perhaps the most fearful testimony known to the law of evidence”); accord Webster, supra, 623 A.2d at 1204 (quoting Wehrle)', Jackson v. Fogg, 589 F.2d 108, 112 (2d Cir.1978) ("convictions based solely on testimony that identifies a defendant previously unknown to the witness are highly suspect”) (internal brackets omitted). 12 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Iqbal Jafree v. Scott
N.D. Ill. · 1974 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Donato, 379 F.2d 288 (3rd Cir. 1968); United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863 (2nd Cir. 1965); State v. Robinson, 86 N.J.Super. 308 , 206 A.2d 779 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Biehunik v. Felicetta
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Blok, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 326 , 188 F.2d 1019 (1951) (search of government employee’s desk unreasonable where desk permitted to be used for private storage) with United States v. Donato, 269 F.Supp. 921 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d mem., 379 F.2d 288 (3d Cir. 1967) (search of mint employee’s locker reasonable where lockers were regularly inspected for sanitary reasons, and regulation expressly negated private use). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Joseph Donato
16369.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 9, 1967.
379 F.2d 288
Published

379 F.2d 288

UNITED STATES of America,
v.
Joseph DONATO, Appellant.

No. 16369.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 7, 1967.
Decided May 9, 1967.

Herman Bloom, Philadelphia, Pa. (Herbert Fisher, Bloom, Ocks & Fisher, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Robert St. Leger Goggin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Harold S. O'Brian, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN and GANEY, Circuit Judges, and NEALON, Distrct Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

1

On review of this record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court, 269 F.Supp. 921, will be affirmed upon the opinions of Judge Van Dusen therein.