green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
La Van v. United States
See Fletcher § 5913; see also Strougo v. Bassini, 282 F.3d 162 (2d Cir.2002); Jensen v. Voyles, 393 F.2d 131, 133 (10th Cir.1968) (“Although a stockholder may not recover in his own right for an injury to the corporation which causes a depreciation in value of his shares, the majority rule permits a stockholder who has been individually injured to sue in his own right even if the corporation is also injured.”) (Footnotes omitted.) However, where the diminution in the value of stock is due to harm caused to the corporation, the injury is not separate and distinct, and thus, the cause of ac…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lochhead v. Alacano
Elster v. American Airlines, Inc., 100 A.2d at 222 . “[T]he majority rule permits a stockholder who has been individually injured to sue in his own right even if the corporation is also injured.” Jensen v. Voyles, 393 F.2d 131, 133 (10th Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
EMI LTD. v. Bennett
Von Brimer v. Whirlpool Corp., 536 F.2d 838, 846 (9th Cir.1976); Erlich v. Glasner, 418 F.2d 226, 227-28 (9th Cir.1969); Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251, 255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1077 , 93 S.Ct. 689 , 34 L.Ed.2d 665 (1972); Jensen v. Voyles, 393 F.2d 131, 133 (10th Cir.1968).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Blodgett v. County of Santa Cruz
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); Jensen v. Voyles, 393 F.2d 131, 133 (10th Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
(2×)
See, e. g., Haberman v. Murchison, 468 F. 2d 1305, 1311 (CA2 1972); Landy v. FDIC, 486 F. 2d 139 , 156-157 (CA3 1973), cert. denied, 416 U. S. 960 (1974); Sargent v. Genesco, Inc., 492 F. 2d 750, 763 (CA5 1974); Simmons v. Wolfson, 428 F. 2d 455, 456 (CA6 1970), cert. denied, 400 U. S. 999 (1971); City National Bank v. Vanderboom, 422 F. 2d 221 , 227-228 (CA8), cert. denied, 399 U. S. 905 (1970); Mount Clemens Industries, Inc. v. Bell, supra ; Jensen v. Voyles, 393 F. 2d 131, 133 (CA10 1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Knauff v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
See Jensen v. Voyles, 10 Cir., 393 F.2d 131, 133 .
cited
Cited "see"
Knauff v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
See Jensen v. Voyles, 10 Cir., 393 F.2d 131, 133 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AIR CARRIER ENGINE SERVICE, INC., Creditor, Appellant,
v.
RUTAS AEREAS NACIONALES, S. A., Debtor, Appellee
v.
RUTAS AEREAS NACIONALES, S. A., Debtor, Appellee
24273.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 31, 1967.
Samuel A. Brodnax, Jr., Miami, Fla., for appellant, Batchelor, Brodnax, Guthrie & Kindred, Miami, Fla., of counsel., Philip T. Weinstein, Cunningham & Weinstein, Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Tuttle, Washington, Simpson.
Published
PER CURIAM:
We conclude that the order of the District Court here appealed from is an ap-pealable order, contrary to the contention of the appellee. We are also convinced that the District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, had jurisdiction under Section 2(a) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 11(a), to entertain and conduct Chapter XI proceedings commenced by this Venezuelan air carrier.
The judgment is affirmed.