green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Early v. United States
See Smith v. United States, 277 F.Supp. 850 (D.C.Md.1967), aff. 401 F.2d 773 (4th Cir. 1968); Medrano v. United States, 315 F.2d 361 (9th Cir. 1963); and McDowell v. United States, 336 F.2d 435 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. den. 379 U.S. 980 , 85 S.Ct. 685 , 13 L.Ed.2d 571 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rush v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
(2×)
See also, McLaurin v. Burnley, 279 F. Supp. 220 , (N.D.Miss. 1967), aff'd 401 F.2d 773 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 399 U.S. 928 , 90 S.Ct. 2228 , 26 L.Ed.2d 795 (1970); Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963); Stubbs v. Capital Paint Glass Co., 160 Miss. 832 , 135 So. 495 (1931); and Norwood v. State, 136 Miss. 272 , 101 So. 366 (1924).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John Kent SMITH, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
12354_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 15, 1968.
401 F.2d 773
William B. Kempton, Baltimore, Md. (Court-appointed counsel) [L. Vernon Miller, Jr., Baltimore, Md. (Court-appointed counsel) on brief], for appellant., Paul M. Rosenberg, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Stephen H. Sachs, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Sobeloff, Bryan, Butzner.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM:
The judgment denying John Kent Smith’s application for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed upon the opinion of the district court. Smith v. United States, 277 F.Supp. 850 (D.Md.1967).