Jones v. Meade, 510 F.2d 961 (1st Cir. 1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Jones v. Meade, 510 F.2d 961 (1st Cir. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Yonkers Board of Education (nysd, 1984-09-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Yonkers Board of Education
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. Tully, 378 F.Supp. 286, 291-93 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff’d w/o op., 510 F.2d 961 (2d Cir.1975). 12 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Commissioner (2×)
Tax Ct. · 1977 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Gerrit Van De Steeg, 60 T.C. 17, 27 (1973), affd. per curiam 510 F.2d 961 (9th Cir. 1975); Westinghouse Broadcasting Co., 36 T.C. at 921 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Application of William Jones
v.
Robert C. Meade, First Hector H. Gayle, Executive Director, Second John Maylott and Gerald B. Cruise, Department, of Housing and Urban Development, Third
528.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Feb 10, 1975.
510 F.2d 961
Published

510 F.2d 961

Application of William JONES et al., Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
Robert C. MEADE et al., First Respondents-Appellees,
Hector H. Gayle, Executive Director, et al., Second
Respondents-Appellees,
John Maylott and Gerald B. Cruise, Department, of Housing
and Urban Development, Third Respondents-Appellees.

No. 528, Docket 74--2030.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 9, 1975.
Decided Feb. 10, 1975.

Robert Rivers, Westbury, N.Y., for petitioners-appellants.

Richard J. Osterndorf, Mineola, N.Y., for first respondents-appellees.

Ralph A. Nappi, Port Washington, N.Y., for second respondents-appellees.

Harold J. Friedman, Asst. U.S. Atty. (David G. Trager, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Paul B. Bergman, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for third respondents-appellees. BJ Before SMITH, OAKES and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The order of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge John R. Bartels' opinion, 378 F.Supp. 286 (E.D.N.Y.1974).