Puleston v. Alderman, 19 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1944). · Go Syfert
Search
Puleston v. Alderman, 19 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1944). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CAMILLA PULESTON
v.
FRANK C. ALDERMAN, Et Al.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sep 8, 1944.
19 So. 2d 110
Leitner Leitner, attorneys for plaintiff. Frank C. Alderman, Jr., Treadwell Treadwell and J. Lewis Hall, attorneys for defendant.
Buford, Terrell, Chapman, Adams.
Published
PER CURIAM:

Motion for determination of certified question should be denied on authority of J. Schwob Co. of Florida v. Florida Industrial Commission, 11 So. (2nd) 782, 152 Fla. 203. Denial of request for oral argument necessarily follows.

So ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.