green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Stephens v. LeFevre
See Ketchum v. Ward, 422 F.Supp. 934 (W.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd, 556 F.2d 557 (2d Cir. 1977). 9 For these reasons, Petitioner’s first claim is denied.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lindsay v. Henderson
The issue, moreover, is not whether the prosecutor’s conduct was “undesirable, erroneous, or even ‘universally condemned,’ but [whether] it violated some right which was guaranteed to the defendant by the Fourteenth Amendment.” Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146 , 94 S.Ct. 396, 400 , 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973); see also Ketchum v. Ward, 422 F.Supp. 934, 944-47 (W.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d, 556 F.2d 557 (2d Cir. 1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murello
v.
Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Kings
v.
Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Kings
77-2018.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 25, 1977.
556 F.2d 557
Published
Murello
v.
Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Kings
No. 77-2018
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
4/25/77
1
E.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED[*]
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no juri sprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opi nion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0 .23