Bickel v. United States, 564 F.2d 89 (3rd Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Bickel v. United States, 564 F.2d 89 (3rd Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the principle of pink requires this court to accept the opinion of the attorney general of mexico as an official declaration by that government that the effect of the expropriation decree was to extinguish papantla's royalty and participating rights in the expropriated oil.”
36 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. (ca2, 2016-09-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co.
2d Cir. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the principle of pink requires this court to accept the opinion of the attorney general of mexico as an official declaration by that government that the effect of the expropriation decree was to extinguish papantla's royalty and participating rights in the expropriated oil.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Green v. Philbrook
2d Cir. · 1978 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
that ... a parent or relative may also receive an afdc grant does not detract from the person whom the afdc program was designed to aid, namely, the dependent child.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Green v. Philbrook
2d Cir. · 1978 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
that . . . a parent or relative may also receive an afdc grant does not detract from the person whom the afdc program was designed to aid, namely, the dependent child.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Rausch
Bankr. D. Nev. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chambers v. Klein, 419 F.Supp. 569, 583-84 (D.N.J.1976) (SSNs only required for children whose parents received federal aid, and not from other children whose parents did not receive aid, did not violate the equal protection clause), aff'd, 564 F.2d 89 (3rd Cir.1977).
discussed Cited "see" Mcelrath v. Califano
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Chambers v. Klein, 419 F.Supp. 569 (D.N.J.1976), aff'd mem., 564 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1977); Green v. Philbrook, 576 F.2d 440 (2d Cir. 1978); Arthur v. Department of Social and Health Services, 19 Wash.App. 542 , 576 P.2d 921 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" McElrath v. Califano
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Chambers v. Klein, 419 F.Supp. 569 (D.N.J.1976), aff’d mem., 564 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1977); Green v. Philbrook, 576 F.2d 440 (2d Cir. 1978); Arthur v. Department of Social and Health Services, 19 Wash.App. 542 , 576 P.2d 921 (1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. State
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chambers v. Klein, 419 F.Supp. 569, 578 (D.N.J.1976), aff'd, 564 F.2d 89 (3rd Cir.1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bickel
v.
United States
76-2524.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Sep 8, 1977.
564 F.2d 89
Published
3 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: Second Circuit (3)

564 F.2d 89

Bickel
v.
U. S.

No. 76-2524

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

9/8/77

1

W.D.Pa.

AFFIRMED