Abbott Sec. Corp. v. New York Stock Exch., 569 F.2d 159 (D.C. Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Abbott Sec. Corp. v. New York Stock Exch., 569 F.2d 159 (D.C. Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thill Securities Corp. v. New York Stock Exchange (wied, 1979-08-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thill Securities Corp. v. New York Stock Exchange
E.D. Wis. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Abbott Securities Corp. v. New York Stock Exchange, 384 F.Supp. 668 (D.D.C.1974), aff’d, 186 U.S.App.D.C. 328 , 569 F.2d 159 (1977), wherein the Court, in reviewing a challenge under the antitrust laws to the antirebate rule of the New York Stock Exchange, found that the rule was “inextricably intertwined with the practice of fixing commission rates,” that it was subject to review and was in fact reviewed by the SEC, and therefore that the Gordon decision was dispositive.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abbott Securities Corp.
v.
New York Stock Exchange
76-1927.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Dec 21, 1977.
569 F.2d 159
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

569 F.2d 159

186 U.S.App.D.C. 328

Abbott Securities Corp.
v.
New York Stock Exchange

No. 76-1927

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

12/21/77

1

D.C.D.C.

AFFIRMED