Ratta v. Maridolo Navegacion, S.A, 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Ratta v. Maridolo Navegacion, S.A, 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rubenstein v. Siokas (nysd, 2020-07-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Rubenstein v. Siokas
S.D.N.Y. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morales v. Gould Inv’rs Tr., 445 F. Supp. 1144, 1151 (S.D.N.Y. 1977), aff’d, 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir. 1978) (determining that “it would be improvident” to determine whether a sales contract was binding under New York law, because the construction of the term “sales” within the 1934 Act is a question of federal law) (citation omitted); see also Oliff v. Exch.
cited Cited "see" Graduation Solutions LLC v. Acadima, LLC
D. Conn. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Samet & Wells, Inc. v. Shalom Toy Co., Inc., 429 F. Supp. 895 , 903–04 (E.D.N.Y. 1977), aff’d, 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir. 1978).
discussed Cited "see" Morales v. New Valley Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Id. ("If there were a transfer of interest insufficient to constitute a 'sale', then this Court cannot reach the question whether such transfers contained sufficient potential for 'speculative abuse' to trigger 16(b) coverage.”). 6 .Accordingly, plaintiff’s citation of a SEC no-action letter, see Equifax, Inc., Fed.
cited Cited "see" Amsinck v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Samet & Wells, Inc. v. Shalom Toy Co., 429 F.Supp. 895, 902 (E.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd, 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir.1978), quoting 17 U.S.C. § 410 (c). 2.
discussed Cited "see" Van Halen Music v. Foos
D. Mont. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fitzgerald Publishing Co., Inc. v. Baylor Publishing Co., Inc., 807 F.2d 1110, 1113 (2nd Cir.1986) (citing Samet & Wells, Inc. v. Shalom Toy Co., 429 F.Supp. 895, 904 (E.D.N.Y.1977), affirmed 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir.1978); Costello Publishing Co. v. Rotelle, 670 F.2d 1035, 1044 (D.C.Cir.1981)); Microsoft Corp. v. Very Competitive Computer Products Corp., 671 F.Supp. 1250 (N.D.Cal.1987); Ford Motor Co. v. B & H Supply, Inc., 646 F.Supp. 975 (D.Minn.1986).
discussed Cited "see" Decorative Aides Corp. v. Staple Sewing Aides Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Samet & Wells, Inc. v. Shalom Toy Co., Inc., 429 F.Supp. 895 (E.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir. 1978); Paulsen v. Personality Posters, Inc., 59 Misc.2d 444 , 299 N.Y.S.2d 501 (Sup. 1968).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Capitol Records, Inc. v. Wings Digital Corp.
E.D.N.Y · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp., 93 F.2d 671, 673 (2d Cir.1938); see also Samet & Wells, Inc. v. Shalom Toy Co., Inc., 429 F.Supp. 895, 904 (E.D.N.Y.1977) (stating that “[a]n individual, including an officer... of a corporation who participates in the acts constituting infringement is personally liable, jointly and severally with the corporate defendant”), aff'd, 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir.1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Van Dusen v. Southeast First Nat. Bank
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Frederick Chusid & Co., 326 F. Supp. at 1064 ; see, e.g., Samet & Wells, Inc. v. Shalom Toy Co., 429 F. Supp. 895, 903 (E.D.N.Y. 1977), aff'd without opinion, 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir.1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Redd Horne, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Samet & Wells, Inc. v. Shalom Toy Co., 429 F.Supp. 895, 903-04 (E.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd without opinion, 578 F.2d 1369 (2d Cir.1978); accord Donsco, Inc. v. Casper Corp., 587 F.2d 602, 605-07 (3d Cir.1978) (corporate officer held personally liable in unfair competition action).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ratta
v.
Maridolo Navegacion, S.A
77-7538.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 1, 1978.
578 F.2d 1369
Published

578 F.2d 1369

Ratta
v.
Maridolo Navegacion, S.A.

No. 77-7538

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

6/1/78

1

S.D.N.Y.

2

AFFIRMED[*]

*

Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23