green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Board of Education v. Leininger
See, e.g., Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 310 , 108 S.Ct. 592, 597 , 98 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988) (“[T]he EHA confers upon disabled students an enforceable substantive right to public education in participating States____”) (emphasis added); Board of Educ. of Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist., Westchester County v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 189 , 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3042 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982) (“[T]he face of the [EHA] evinces a congressional intent to bring previously excluded handicapped children into the public education systems of the States and to require the States to adopt procedures which woul…
cited
Cited "see"
McLemore v. Olson (In Re B & L Laboratories, Inc.)
See Fischer v. United States, 441 F.Supp. 32 (ED.Pa.1977) aff'd, 582 F.2d 1274 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Mauricio and Dina Scokin, Individually and as Next Friend of Davina Scokin, a Minor v. The State of Texas
See Eberle v. Board of Education, 444 F.Supp. 41 (D.Pa.1977), aff’d, 582 F.2d 1274 (3rd Cir.1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kaylar Development Corporation, in the Matter Of
77-2617_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Aug 11, 1978.
582 F.2d 1274
Published
Kaylar Development Corporation, In the Matter of
No. 77-2617
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
8/11/78
1
W.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED