green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Household Finance Corporation v. Nival
It stated that “[although the form in question may not provide disclosure in a sequence that optimizes clarity we conclude that [the creditor] has provided [the debtor] with a disclosure statement that is sufficiently understandable to meet the requirements of [the TILA regulations].” Id., 832; see Lamar v. American Finance System of Fulton County, Inc., 577 F.2d 953, 954 (5th Cir.), reh. denied, 584 F.2d 389 (5th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Household Finance Corporation v. Nival
It stated that "[a]lthough the form in question may not provide disclosure in a sequence that optimizes clarity we conclude that [the creditor] has provided [the debtor] with a disclosure statement that is sufficiently understandable to meet the requirements of [the TILA regulations]." Id., 832; see Lamar v. American Finance System of Fulton County, Inc., 577 F.2d 953 , 954 (5th Cir.), reh. denied, 584 F.2d 389 (5th Cir. 1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lamar
v.
American Finance System of Fulton County, Inc
v.
American Finance System of Fulton County, Inc
76-4097.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 24, 1978.
584 F.2d 389
Published
Lamar
v.
American Finance System of Fulton County, Inc.
No. 76-4097
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
10/24/78
N.D.Ga., 577 F.2d 953