green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
“academic admissions criteria . . . . are non-commercial in nature. the sherman act was certainly not intended to provide a forum wherein disgruntled applicants to medical school could challenge their rejections.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pierce v. Yale University
academic admissions criteria . . . . are non-commercial in nature. the sherman act was certainly not intended to provide a forum wherein disgruntled applicants to medical school could challenge their rejections.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jung v. Association of American Medical Colleges
See Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd without opinion, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980) (plaintiff's contention that “injuries and facts relevant to other members of the class should be used in determining jurisdiction” was rejected because "the named representative himself must satisfy all jurisdictional prerequisites before the action can go forward”); accord Williams v. FirstPlus Home Owner Loan Trust 1996-2, 209 F.R.D. 404, 413 (W.D.Tenn.2002); Barry v. Mortgage Servicing Acquisition Corp., 909 F.Supp. 65, 74-75 (D.R.I.1995). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hamilton Chapter Of Alpha Delta Phi, Inc. v. Hamilton College
See Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 621 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Hamilton Chapter of Alpha Delta Phi, Inc. v. Hamilton College
See Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 621 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir. 1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Saudi Computer Aided Translation Ltd. v. Weidner Communications Corp.
See Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 612-13 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dalow Industries, Inc. v. Jordache Enterprises, Inc.
See Ufheil Construction Co. v. Town of New Windsor (S.D.N.Y.1979) 478 F.Supp. 766, 768-69 , aff’d (1980) 636 F.2d 1204 (where arbitrators gave no reasons for award, there was no basis to determine identity of issue).
cited
Cited "see"
Norris v. Grosvenor Marketing Ltd.
See Ufheil Const. Co. v. Town of New Windsor, 478 F.Supp. 766, 768 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980); see also American Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lemme v. Wine of Japan Import, Inc.
To find jurisdiction based on agency, plaintiff must establish that Wine of Japan “acted in this state for the benefit of and with the knowledge and consent of [Konishi] and [Konishi] must exercise some element of control over [Wine of Japan].” Louis Marx & Co. v. Fuji Seiko Co., 453 F.Supp. 385, 390 (S.D.N.Y.1978); see Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 611 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd without opinion, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
SCAC Transport (USA) Inc. v. S.S. \Danaos\""
(2×)
See Ufheil Construction Company v. New Windsor, 478 F.Supp. 766, 769-70 (S.D.N.Y.1979), affirmed, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
JSC Securities, Inc. v. Gebbia
Katz v. Financial Clearing & Services Corp., 794 F.Supp. 88, 95 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (in federal action following confirmation of NYSE arbitration award in New York state court, “res judicata binds not only as to every matter offered and received, but also as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose”); see also Ufheil Construction Co. v. Town of New Windsor, 478 F.Supp. 766, 768 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980); Corto v. Lefrak, 155 A.D.2d 246 , 546 N.Y.S.2d 856 , 857 (1st Dep’t 1989), app. de *251 nied, 75 N.Y.2d 707 , 554 N.Y.S.2d 476 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bulk Oil (USA) Inc. v. Sun Oil Trading Co.
See also Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 612-13 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980); Bialek v. Racal-Milgo, Inc., 545 F.Supp. 25, 35 (S.D.N.Y.1982); McLaughlin’s Practice Commentary C302:17, N.Y.Civ.Prac.Law § 302 (McKinney 1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gibbons v. Udaras Na Gaeltachta
See, e.g., Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 611 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem., 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980); Plaza Realty Investors v. Bailey, 484 F.Supp. 335, 347 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Brown
v.
Brown
80-1154.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Sep 19, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
U. S.
v.
Brown
80-1154
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit
9/19/80
1
S.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED