United States v. Brown, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir. 1980). · Go Syfert
United States v. Brown, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“academic admissions criteria . . . . are non-commercial in nature. the sherman act was certainly not intended to provide a forum wherein disgruntled applicants to medical school could challenge their rejections.”
83 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pierce v. Yale University (dcd, 2019-01-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Pierce v. Yale University
D.D.C. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
academic admissions criteria . . . . are non-commercial in nature. the sherman act was certainly not intended to provide a forum wherein disgruntled applicants to medical school could challenge their rejections.
discussed Cited "see" Jung v. Association of American Medical Colleges
D.D.C. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd without opinion, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980) (plaintiff's contention that “injuries and facts relevant to other members of the class should be used in determining jurisdiction” was rejected because "the named representative himself must satisfy all jurisdictional prerequisites before the action can go forward”); accord Williams v. FirstPlus Home Owner Loan Trust 1996-2, 209 F.R.D. 404, 413 (W.D.Tenn.2002); Barry v. Mortgage Servicing Acquisition Corp., 909 F.Supp. 65, 74-75 (D.R.I.1995). 9 .
cited Cited "see" Hamilton Chapter Of Alpha Delta Phi, Inc. v. Hamilton College
2d Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 621 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980).
cited Cited "see" Hamilton Chapter of Alpha Delta Phi, Inc. v. Hamilton College
2d Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 621 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir. 1980).
cited Cited "see" Saudi Computer Aided Translation Ltd. v. Weidner Communications Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 612-13 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see" Dalow Industries, Inc. v. Jordache Enterprises, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ufheil Construction Co. v. Town of New Windsor (S.D.N.Y.1979) 478 F.Supp. 766, 768-69 , aff’d (1980) 636 F.2d 1204 (where arbitrators gave no reasons for award, there was no basis to determine identity of issue).
cited Cited "see" Norris v. Grosvenor Marketing Ltd.
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ufheil Const. Co. v. Town of New Windsor, 478 F.Supp. 766, 768 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980); see also American Ins.
discussed Cited "see" Lemme v. Wine of Japan Import, Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
To find jurisdiction based on agency, plaintiff must establish that Wine of Japan “acted in this state for the benefit of and with the knowledge and consent of [Konishi] and [Konishi] must exercise some element of control over [Wine of Japan].” Louis Marx & Co. v. Fuji Seiko Co., 453 F.Supp. 385, 390 (S.D.N.Y.1978); see Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 611 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd without opinion, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see" SCAC Transport (USA) Inc. v. S.S. \Danaos\"" (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ufheil Construction Company v. New Windsor, 478 F.Supp. 766, 769-70 (S.D.N.Y.1979), affirmed, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." JSC Securities, Inc. v. Gebbia
S.D.N.Y. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Katz v. Financial Clearing & Services Corp., 794 F.Supp. 88, 95 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (in federal action following confirmation of NYSE arbitration award in New York state court, “res judicata binds not only as to every matter offered and received, but also as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose”); see also Ufheil Construction Co. v. Town of New Windsor, 478 F.Supp. 766, 768 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980); Corto v. Lefrak, 155 A.D.2d 246 , 546 N.Y.S.2d 856 , 857 (1st Dep’t 1989), app. de *251 nied, 75 N.Y.2d 707 , 554 N.Y.S.2d 476 , …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bulk Oil (USA) Inc. v. Sun Oil Trading Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 612-13 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980); Bialek v. Racal-Milgo, Inc., 545 F.Supp. 25, 35 (S.D.N.Y.1982); McLaughlin’s Practice Commentary C302:17, N.Y.Civ.Prac.Law § 302 (McKinney 1972).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Gibbons v. Udaras Na Gaeltachta
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Selman v. Harvard Medical School, 494 F.Supp. 603, 611 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem., 636 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir.1980); Plaza Realty Investors v. Bailey, 484 F.Supp. 335, 347 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Brown
80-1154.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Sep 19, 1980.
636 F.2d 1204

636 F.2d 1204

U. S.
v.
Brown

80-1154

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit

9/19/80

1

S.D.N.Y.

AFFIRMED