Weyer v. Levine (In Re Dot MD, LLC), 335 B.R. 326 (11th Cir. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Weyer v. Levine (In Re Dot MD, LLC), 335 B.R. 326 (11th Cir. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Rajesh C Patel (ganb, 2019-09-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Rajesh C Patel
Bankr. N.D. Ga. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weyer v. Levine (In re DotMD, LLC), 145 F. App’x 326, 327 (11th Cir. 2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re: DOT MD, LLC Debtor. Frank M. Weyer, as Assignee of the Judgements of East Coast Internet and Internet.MD, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Morton Levine, Chapter 11 Trustee for the Estate of Dot MD, LLC, Defendant-Appellee
04-13367.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 12, 2005.
335 B.R. 326
Frank M. Weyer, Beverly Hills, CA, pro se., Stephen H. Block, Levine & Block, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Edmondson, Birch, Cox.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Unpublished
PER CURIAM.

Frank M. Weyer, a creditor of Dot MD, LLC, appeals the district court’s affir-mance of the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Morton P. Levine, the bankruptcy trustee. The bankruptcy court determined that Weyer’s judgment lien did not attach to proceeds of a settlement agreement between the Trustee and MoldData. In re DotMD, LLC, 303 B.R. 519 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.2003). Because the proceeds from MoldData’s agreement with the trustee were not from the sale of assets that Dot MD properly or presently held, but represented a settlement — at least in part — of disputed contractual claims, we conclude that the bankruptcy court did not err in determining that the creditor’s judgment did not attach to the proceeds. See O.C.G.A. § 44-12-20; Prodigy Centers/Atlanta v. T-C Assocs., 269 Ga. 522, 501 S.E.2d 209, 211 n. 3 (1998).

AFFIRMED.